Lou Zeller's Decades of Work in Pictures Part Three

 

Lou Zeller's Decades of Work in Pictures Part Two

Radioactive Money Machine operated by "Dr. Smello"

 Lou Zeller being carried out of state meeting on the Low-Level Radioactive Waste dump being broadcast on the North Carolina Public Television Network by WUNC—Feb. 21, 1990.   Photo by Laura Drey

                  Dr. Smello at the Miss Nuclear North Carolina pageant 

involving BREDL staffer Therese Vick            

Lou being interviewed in Bent Mountain, VA during The Stop The Pipeline—Roll Back Pollution tour April 4-11, 2017  It included a Mock Compressor Station which replicated the noise from a compressor station.

Lou Zeller's Decades of Work in Pictures Part One

 

  Lou Zeller, Charlottesville, VA  Anti-  Nuclear Day of Action  March 25, 2004 

Lou Zeller and Claude Ward demonstrate the operation of the bucket device which grabs air samples during Bucket Brigade Training in Winston-Salem Aug. 18, 2001 

Lou performing as Captain Slow, a part of “The Big Throwaway” presentation from BREDL’s Earth Stage Productions  1993

Lou performing as Captain Slow         

Lou as Compost Chef with students from Pender County Schools                         

(source: The Pender Post, January 29, 1992)

Congratulations Lou—Happy Retirement!

 

Thank you for decades of leadership and community organizing

In light of Lou Zeller's August 18 retirement from the position of Executive Director of BREDL, which he has held since 2012, BREDL staff interviewed him to give him an opportunity to reminisce about the history of BREDL, the history of his role in its founding, development, and operations, and his wishes for the future of BREDL. All BREDL staff are going to miss working with Lou, and we offer our warmest wishes for what we know will be a fun-packed retirement!

Listen to Lou's Interview on BREDL's In Our Backyard podcast:https://anchor.fm/bredl/episodes/BONUS-Celebrating-Lou-Zeller-35-years-with-Blue-Ridge-Environmental-Defense-League-e1629v3

Interviewer: Can you talk about Bernard Goss and Janet Marsh's decision at the founding of BREDL to use chapters as an integral element in the structure of the BREDL organization?

Lou: People like Bernard Goss saw that places that were sited for one waste dump would be sited for another environmental threat later on. Decisions on where to build polluting facilities are based on political power, not scientific merit. It's a plain English description of something which academics have demonstrated over the years. Dr. Robert Bullard, the author of Dumping in Dixie, was an excellent researcher. He said you can predict the proximity of pollution by Zip Code. Designated areas, sacrifice zones, according to Zip Code. Bernard Goss saw the same thing.

A BREDL chapter is an association designed to win the immediate campaign by mobilizing resources and getting a reputation for winning. After the win, that chapter group, by being affiliated with a larger organization and perhaps moving onto another issue of an entirely different nature, would be there when the next threat came. It might be totally different – solid waste, asphalt, incinerator – that chapter's core group would still be there, under the umbrella of the League. Some chapters have had two or three campaigns. During the period between fights, projects can be undertaken to build unity, strengths, and associations. A BREDL chapter in Tennessee has an annual Christmas party that's a lot of fun and worth going to, food, drink and treats, a real Christmas party. It's done every year, and keeps the group intact. They've won two victories so far. In Burke County, North Carolina, the first campaign was a hazardous waste tank farm, then a landfill. Then the chapter pursued enactment of a land-use management ordinance as a tripwire to future environmental threats. They stayed around to enact this ordinance based on their reputation for stopping the tank farm. They had credibility and moxie to be a political presence on the policy of land use management in Burke County. Then a new waste dump was proposed. The chapter was there and ready to go.

Bernard's concept in using chapters as the foundation of BREDL was that they would be soundly rooted for the long term in the community of people directly affected by an issue, not going anywhere, forming associations that would last for decades. Not every BREDL chapter is committed to doing that, however. Sometimes a chapter will win and then they go back to soccer games and church and other activities that make life worth living. Even in that case, they’ve got our name and number and we’ve got theirs, so when something happens, we each know who to call. The chapter in Hamlet, North Carolina fought a low-level radioactive waste dump during the 80s and 90s. It took years, but they were successful. About six months ago, after a biochar facility was proposed in the same community, a local resident called BREDL, saying, “My daddy said I should call you.” Some chapters last decades. The chapter in Sanford is an interesting example. The Cumnock Preservation Association on the banks of the Deep River found itself in the crosshairs of proposed fracking in the Triassic basin (the threat remains), and decided to become a BREDL chapter. In 2014, the Dan River coal ash spill happened-inflaming controversy over coal ash disposal. The state of North Carolina began looking for places to dump coal ash. They chose Chatham and Lee Counties. The Cumnock group then morphed into EnvironmentaLEE (ELEE). The chapter was, by that time, geared up and ready to go, with some of the same people from the original preservation association. ELEE is in the process of reformulating the chapter in the wake of BREDL's coal ash victory.

Interviewer: In your April 2019 Executive Director’s report in the League Line, you write about how a reporter, interviewing Janet in 1995, asked her, “Can you win?” You say that Janet replied to this question without hesitation, saying, “Yes, without a doubt. Whenever a group of people put together a citizens’ action campaign and develop and implement strategies and ask themselves how far they’ll go and what they’re willing to do; as long as the answer is ‘Whatever it takes,’ they can’t possibly lose.” Could you reflect on the meaning of Janet’s use of “Whatever it takes”?

Lou: The reason I wrote about that, and the reason Janet said it, is because it’s true. It sounds simple, whatever it takes, but it is the key to success. This seems to be the difference between us and other environmental organizations. We pick up the fight, the campaign, even when the odds are against you, overwhelming odds against you. You’ve seen this happen, victories we’ve had when it was deemed impossible or not winnable, or not worth the sacrifice it would take to win. But when people’s homes, neighborhoods, communities, families, and neighbors are at risk, of course they are willing to do whatever it takes. But somebody’s got to say it. In the heat of a campaign, we’ll get a news story, phone call, or text message with a cry for help, saying, “Can you help us? We heard about you.” Until organized, these people have the strength and the power but don’t see it and don’t utilize it. So it seems fruitless to do anything about the issue because they are up against a powerful company with money and lawyers, or a state agency that issues permits, or a federal agency that’s got all the money in the world and experts galore to wreak environmental havoc. 

That’s where we started out. In 1985, I started hearing about federal plans for a high-level nuclear waste dump that would hold fuel rods from nuclear power stations after they had been irradiated for several years. When Janet held her first public forum in Glendale Springs, she invited the whole community, including some elected officials. She didn’t put the public officials on the dais so that they could spout information in our direction. She had the elected officials sitting in the front of the room as part of the audience, not to speak, but to listen. Janet had reversed the roles. How many times have you heard community activists say, “We’ve gotta get Rep. So-and-So to speak at our meeting.” Or a company representative, which will get people lined up at the door to attend. But you are playing with a weak hand in those cases. Whether an elected official or company representative, they’ve already got answers to the smartest question you can ask. What Janet did in Glendale Springs in 1985 was to have the public officials listen to what we had to say. We had knowledgeable speakers lined up that day, and the elected officials got a lesson in how much we had been able to learn about nuclear waste. They also got the lesson that the people were not happy and were taking steps to organize themselves. The people were garnering political power, not through party politics, but much more fundamentally, what the United States is built on.

When BREDL gets called into a community, one of our first underlying missions, whether it’s a county, state, or federal issue, is to alter the balance of power. That’s what “whatever it takes” means. Whatever it is that you can do to establish your own credibility in having accurate information. Being able to put that information out in a way that is understandable to the layperson. Our mission is fighting the battle for public opinion, which is the highest court in the land, not with lawyers, but in the public. If you want to get the word out, how do you do it? BREDL offers workshops on how to get publicity, do a press release, write a fact sheet. Getting your message out costs a bit of money. Yard signs can run into hundreds of dollars. T-shirts are popular items for building solidarity. Billboards on major highways give people the message day after day. Showing up at a public hearing or at a county meeting in numbers is a good thing. It gives a visible sign of unrest in the community, altering the balance of power. Sometimes you don’t have the numbers, so you’ve got to be creative to amplify your voice. The group in Anson County, North Carolina fighting a commercial waste dump had their members contribute photos of family members, which were then printed on 8.5 x 11 sheets of paper. They spread these photos all over the floor of the entryway of the county courthouse, forcing elected officials to walk over the photos of the people who were against the project. That tactic inspired unity, was non-violent, and boxed the officials in. One group took the signed petitions they had collected and, instead of putting them in a stack, taped them together and rolled them onto a stick. This “trail” of petitions was unrolled at the public hearing, some 50-60 feet long.

“Whatever it takes” means not taking the easy way out. “Whatever it takes” means taking a clear stand. “Whatever it takes” means you say “we’re going to stop it”. Going for the legal tactic, although often part of “whatever it takes”, is just one tool, along with public education, direct action, fundraising. Each step must be doable, each subsequent step becomes more doable based on the previous step, all lead to the goal. That’s “whatever it takes”. Do first things first, leave things that look impossible for later in the campaign. Aim for systematic ramping up of pressure by the people, changing the balance of power, putting power into the hands of people instead of those of captured public officials. Captured public officials are those who have bought the company line. This company has waltzed into town. They are well dressed, well-spoken, they know how to do public relations, and they offer a smattering of technical information. They are primarily publicists and can present a convincing argument, typically focusing on job creation. County and state officials’ eyes light up when they hear “jobs”. They don’t question it. It’s up to the people who are directly affected to say, “Wait a minute. Where does this lead? Who gets the pollution? Who gets the groundwater contamination? Who gets the asthma from an asphalt plant built in a residential area?” Captured officials are officials who haven’t examined the issue well enough to understand that it’s bad news for their community. But they can become uncaptured. In Surry County, North Carolina there was a BREDL fight to stop a poultry manure incinerator electricity generating power plant. This plant had been sanctioned by the North Carolina General Assembly in 2007 as part of the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard, of all things. They had prominent environmental groups lined up behind it, requiring renewable energy, a certain percentage by a certain date. County commissioners were convinced of the value of the poultry manure incinerator and had approved infrastructure to support the project, including a water line to the incinerator site. A BREDL campaign, using all the tactics we have discussed in this interview and more, ramped up. We were able to reverse the county commission’s decision, and they rescinded the project. All five of the commissioners voted against the project. Surry County is not like Durham or Asheville or some other liberal bastion. This is Surry County, a very conservative culture.

Tenacity, endurance, and persistence are oftentimes the key, part of “whatever it takes”. This is determination to see a project through to the end and not give up. That’s the purpose of community organizing, and expecting one, two, or six people to do all the work is a lot to ask. Therefore, you organize a working group, a committee, a local organization, people who are directly affected. When one person steps down or has a job change or life change, or is simply exhausted from late night calls and all the stuff involved in a fight, there is somebody else who says, “Let’s continue the campaign.” New people step up to fill the shoes. Leadership could change, can become a shared responsibility.

Interviewer: Can you reflect on your skit as Captain Slow?

Lou: Captain Slow was a character I did in the public school for grade school students. The kids liked it and the teachers liked it as well. It was a really fun way to bring environmental issues to children of the people in the community. BREDL is an educational organization. I did the children's programs for that reason alone. It didn't hurt to have the ancillary benefit of presenting something like Big Throwaway: A Comedy of Global Impact, and Compost Chef, a blend of science and magic. Big Throwaway is silent comedy, based on a Charlie Chaplin routine which I borrowed from and turned into an allegory about our throw-away society. It had the benefit of not only educating children, but also allowing us the opportunity to give each child in attendance a flyer to take home and show to Mom and Dad. So it allowed us to do some community organizing, as well.

Interviewer: What can you share about your role as Compost Chef?

Lou: Compost Chef was a magic show for young children, designed to spark imagination and showcase what might otherwise be the tedious subject of making compost, which is about as exciting as watching cement dry. It was a magic show in which I offered a series of tricks and small stage magic routines. I made flowers grow out of compost, for example. I showed how you can put your kitchen waste into a container and do certain things with it, and after a period of time you get fertilizer, flowers, and food.

Interviewer: Please describe your role in Radioactive Money Machine.

Lou: Radioactive Money Machine was edgier. It evolved over the years, focused on the nuclear dump issue. The first time I did the routine was in 1987. I had been doing this kind of work before I came to BREDL. New Vaudeville, it is called. Some routines I had done were slapstick and juggling. I went to classes, workshops, and retreats to get training, worked with various artists of national and international renown. One of these was Yuri Belov, a Russian comedian who held a workshop in Philadelphia where I learned about comedic timing and the requirements of comedy. I also studied with Peter Hoff, an American clown, from whom I learned about putting a program together through a series of steps. Leo Bassi gave a workshop which I attended on being creative, being convincing in your role as actor.

Then I started providing workshops, one of which was CROP Walk in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, on behalf of a nonprofit called CROP. Their mission was feeding the hungry, and they would do a walk every year. I provided training workshops for them on how to make up characters, characters in costume. I worked in the world of New Vaudeville during the 1970s and 80s. At that time, I was doing musical work, playing in an acoustic jug band. I met a team of performers who combined juggling and comedy. We swapped ideas. I learned how to juggle, and we formed an outfit together. We would do shows for bars and clubs in Georgia and North Carolina. They were slapstick, juggling, vaudeville routines, not musical shows.

Earth Stage grew out of that history. Radioactive Money Machine was one of the most edgy of these routines. Before getting involved with BREDL, around 1982, I did a skit called Major General Destruction. It was about the arms race, a routine I developed where I played a military man in a general's uniform. I went to the local Salvation Army and bought a military officer's jacket, to which I attached badges and medals. I carried a suitcase onto the stage. It was a juggling routine, juggling two nuclear missiles and a ball, which was Planet Earth. I was a madcap general playing with Earth's future. Charles Chaplin did a silent movie in which he played a comic rendition of Hitler. He has a very large beach ball which is Planet Earth, which he bounces during the skit. This gave me the germ of the idea for Big Throwaway, which I performed for children and adults. In the skit, you can see a prop that's a trash can filled with objects. I would do slapstick, chasing the objects around on stage, juggling plastic jugs and aluminum cans. All ended up in the trash can. The finale was a large inflated beach ball globe, the Earth, three to four feet in diameter. I would do a dance, bouncing the ball on the floor while dancing, playing with the Earth as with a toy. At the end of the program, I would put the Earth on top of the filled-up trash can. Voices appeared out of nowhere, scolding me for throwing the Earth away. The protagonist was learning about not throwing the Earth away. He rescues the Earth and says he's sorry while standing on top of the trash heap. Kids and adults would get into it.

I did this type of skit in concert with BREDL chapters and other local groups trying to stop waste dumps. The routine took 20 to 25 minutes. The local leader would come out at the end of each skit and talk about the issue at hand. Flyers would be distributed.

Interviewer: How many of those skits do you think you did, in total, and where did you do them?

Lou: Scores, close to 100 shows, pretty much all over the BREDL service area, a lot in North Carolina and Georgia, and other states as well.

Interviewer: Can you tell us the story behind the photo, dated February 21, 1990, of you being hauled out of a public meeting?

Lou: We were in the thick of the low-level radioactive waste dump campaign. A meeting had been scheduled at the PBS television station, WUNC in Raleigh, North Carolina. We had been working against the state of North Carolina’s search for a place to dump 30 million cubic feet of low-level radioactive waste. This type of waste includes pretty much everything that goes into the trash at a nuclear power plant, including gloves and booties that you wear in a radioactive area, white plastic suits, and scintillation vials. Low-level nuclear waste actually includes the power plant itself, once the fuel rods, which are the high-level waste, have been removed. The nuclear industry emphasized the gloves and booties and medical waste as the principal type of waste in this category. We did years of research starting in 1986 to uncover facts about this so-called low-level radioactive waste. For example, I did a study, went to the radiation protection section of the state of North Carolina and obtained copies of every permit, every bill of lading for hospital and medical radioactive waste in the state of North Carolina. I tallied it all up. My study found that the amount of medical radioactive waste was a fraction of a fraction of a decimal point of the total they were talking about. The industry was misrepresenting it. 

The state of North Carolina had narrowed the prospective sites for the low-level nuclear waste site to our locations, two in the western part of the state and two in the east. BREDL took on the western sites. We organized in those communities in the west until they were removed from consideration. We did a lot of publicity, including the Radioactive Money Machine. The site search was narrowed from four to two. Janet and Lisa Finaldi from North Carolina Clean Water Fund put their heads together and divided the two sites up again, with North Carolina Clean Water Fund working at the site in Apex and BREDL in Hamlet.

The North Carolina Low-level Radioactive Waste Management Authority was a 17-member committee of scientists and industry people charged by the state with selecting the waste dump site. We had been to many of their public hearings, and decided to attend the one scheduled in 1990 to occur at a PBS television station in Raleigh. The meeting, at which they were going to discuss their decision on where to place the dump, would be broadcast as part of Stateline, a public interest interview program which was also broadcast into public schools as part of the curricula. The industry and the authority were going to use public airwaves to broadcast this meeting at the level of junior and senior high school students.

On the date of the Authority’s meeting, we arrived early at the TV station, me dressed in jacket and tie and Janet in a nice outfit. Our plan was for someone to stand up and disrupt the proceeding by speaking from the audience, and do it in a way which was not ugly or violent or rude in any way. We had recruited 15-20 volunteers from the Radioactive Waste Roundtable to work with us, keeping our plans a close secret. We entered the TV station when they opened the doors and spread ourselves out throughout the studio, not together. We were ready.

The program started. The Roundtable had selected one person to be the first to speak out of turn. I was that person. The Authority gaveled the meeting into order. I was supposed to pull the trigger when the time seemed right. I knew it had to be early. Dr. Murray, chair of the Authority, banged the gavel. The meeting was called to order and they had the reading of the minutes. The secretary explained the cut-and-dried meeting agenda. Then Dr. Murray asked if there were any additions or changes. I saw my moment and stood up from where I had been seated in the third or fourth row in the studio. I said, “Dr. Murray, I do have a statement I would like to make at this time, if you please.” Dr. Murray was shocked for anybody to do this. I said, “Dr. Murray, I think this is an important issue.” He gaveled me down, saying, “You’re out of order.” I said, “But Dr. Murray, this is a much larger issue, people have come to tell you that choosing a nuclear waste site is an act of great injustice, and we need to bring it to your attention.” I didn’t stop talking. By now the fact that it was in a TV studio meant it wasn’t just PBS, it was also the network news media, CBS, ABC, NBC, in addition to PBS. All cameras were on Lou Zeller now speaking out of turn. I stood there and kept the spiel going at a steady pace.I watched the Authority members trying to figure out what to do with me. The two leaders of the group were there representing their firms, Carolina Power & Light and Duke Energy. I heard someone say, “Mr. Zeller, we’re going to have you escorted out of the room if you don’t sit down.” I continued in the same determined manner. Dr. Murray called in two State Bureau of Investigation security people to escort me out of the room. Improvising, I decided to go limp. The SBI said, “Oh no.” They picked me up. It took them several minutes as I stayed limp. I didn’t stand up, just sat like a doll. Two guys picked me up. They had to clear the way and carried me out of the studio, down the hallway, and out the back door, then dropped me in some mud.

The plan was to have others speak in turn after me. Right after me was one of the members of the Roundtable, Kaye Cameron, in a blue dress. She got up to speak as soon as I was removed from the studio. Kaye did not go limp when Dr. Murray sent the two security personnel to escort her out of the studio. The Authority waited a few minutes to get back to order. Then another person stood up and got escorted out. Then another spoke and was escorted out, for a total of eight or nine escorts. We stole the meeting, stopped this attempt by the Authority to up the ante and further their cause through use of the public TV station. All the school children in North Carolina that day watching the Stateline program, which is still a program on PBS, everybody in the whole state saw it that day on PBS and other news channels. “Activists filibuster Authority meeting” was the headline in the news. Janet said that was a gift and a turning point in the campaign. The Authority never recovered from that blow. Their credibility was diminished. Legislators saw this, word spread that the Authority was trumped by citizens at that meeting, locally-affected citizens such as Kaye Cameron, and Pam Dodson from the Hamlet site, standing up, making statements against the waste dump, and getting escorted out of the room. Turning adversity to advantage, whatever it takes.

Interviewer: What is the significance of the term “sand in the gears” in the context of a fight undertaken by a BREDL chapter?

Lou: One of BREDL's flagship fights was opposition to a low-level nuclear waste dump proposed by the Southeast Compact, which was an eight-state consortium, a legal and administrative agreement among eight states to select one of them for the first of eight dump sites for low-level radioactive waste. Each of the eight states was supposed to take their turn hosting a waste dump site for 20 years. They started doing geological analyses, taking into consideration whether prospective sites were on the coast, in sandy areas, in the western mountainous part of the state, or inside special geological formations. 

The North Carolina Radioactive Waste Management Authority was set up to do the site selection process for eight states’ worth of radioactive waste. They went through a decision-making process in which they selected a group of prospective target areas first, then selected potential dumpsites, two in the west, and two in the eastern part of the state. They were attempting to divide and conquer, pitting one part of the state against another. The same process was used for an incinerator. A series of sites was selected for study in different counties, mostly in rural areas. They played one part of the state against the other. The turning point was when the Granville County and Iredell County groups began working together. They countered this selection process with a unifying theme – “Not here, not there, not anywhere.” They started doing joint fundraising. BREDL went to 22 different counties with our campaign. Granville and Iredell Counties coming together was a turning point. Then they joined BREDL, as did a number of the 22 communities where we conducted campaigns all across North Carolina. We still have a chapter in Statesville, North Carolina, formed during this remarkable campaign.

BREDL's Environmental Justice Coordinator, Charles Utley, uses sand in the gears. Concerned Citizens of Shell Bluff has been fighting Plant Vogtle since 2006. Their challenge of a license for the Savannah River Site's plutonium fuel factory in South Carolina took 20 years. By placing sand in the gears, creating opposition in the community and in the courts, they slowed the process down. Savannah River Site was granted a license for construction of the plutonium fuel factory, which BREDL had challenged before the Atomic Safety Licensing Board. That bought us time. Then we challenged the operating permit in 2007. Both permits were issued, but behind schedule, bills piling up. Meanwhile, earth was turning.

Rapprochement in the form of a joint agreement between the U.S. and Russia, Clinton and Yeltsin, evaporated. This agreement, which would have turned warheads into nuclear power fuel, foundered politically in the U.S. and Russia. Sand in the gears slowed the process down. “Sand in the gears” is a concept I have developed over the years, which is implemented by opposing your opponent everywhere, leaving no weak spots, not picking winners and losers, leaving no sacrifice zones, no weak links in the chain. If there are weak links, that's where you put your strength. “Sand in the gears” is an appropriate metaphor because your opponent with power has nowhere to turn. They have no victim because people are sticking together.

Interviewer: What are your thoughts about BREDL staff – past, present, and future?

Lou: The year following the loss of Janet was a rough patch for me and for the organization. The staff behaved and performed so admirably during that period. Everybody had been given a shock, cold splash of water. Everybody muscled up and did what they needed to do. That’s been a watch word in the larger issue for all of the work that we do. Most of the work that gets done by the staff – chasing down documents, writing letters, finding, studying, and using test equipment, planning and implementing meetings, podcasts, newsletters, research, mapping – that is a style of work that BREDL established intrinsically.

In 1986, BREDL got its first grant, which was given by the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation. They had enough for one salary, so they hired four quarter-time people, including me. Those of us who had been hired were happy to have a little bit of income from something that we were already doing as activists working to save our home from the risk of a nuclear dump. Every one of those first BREDL staff, including Sandy Adair, Bob Gessner, Virginia Hunt, and me, did what we could do best, under Janet’s guidance.

Before I came to BREDL, I was involved in a performing show band, playing music on stage in venues, clubs, auditoriums, theaters, convention halls. I got confident enough doing satires that I attended a public hearing of the North Carolina Low-level Radioactive Waste Management Authority, at Universityof North Carolina in Asheville -- in character. This agency had been set up to find a dump site for low-level radioactive waste. 300 people were in attendance at this meeting which was being held to gather public comments. People wishing to speak at this meeting were asked to sign the sign-up sheet at the entrance to the meeting room. I surreptitiously signed as a made-up character, Dr. Ludwig Smello. This name was a play on one of the nuclear scientists who had invented nuclear weapons, Dr. Victor Tello. I wore a white lab coat, a large red nose, and a hard hat, and carried a large easel pad and a tripod. I waited outside the meeting while others gave comments. Finally, they called on Dr. Smello to give comments. The show was on! I entered with the easel pad, walked to the podium, and did a skit lampooning the credibility of this state agency which had scientists, industry, and business people all sitting at the dais. They didn’t stop me, couldn’t stop me. I had a skit worked out based on an actual technical report written by one of the members of the agency, titled “Bad is Good, Good is Bad”. This report tried to demonstrate how groundwater flow can be both good and bad for the environment. I took that to the bank, used the easel to help deliver the message, “Good is bad, bad is good, down is up, up is down, left is right, right is left, over is under, leftover is in the refrigerator.”

After I had done this act, I invited all the members of the authority sitting there, half a dozen individuals, to demonstrate to the audience how safe radioactive waste dump sites would be. I had prepared six cups with smiley faces on them and gave each authority member one of these cups. I took out a thermos bottle full of boiling hot water colored with green food coloring, filled their cups with the steaming hot green water, poured one for myself, and said, “Gentlemen, let’s demonstrate to the people in the audience that this water is perfectly safe. I brought it from the Chem Nuclear site in Barnwell, South Carolina. I’m sure you want to demonstrate that this water is perfectly safe to drink.” They looked at me like I had two heads. I put the cup to my lips and asked, “Gentlemen, what’s wrong? Nobody’s drinking.” A man in the audience pointed to one of the authority members and said, “He did!” One authority member had actually taken a sip of the green water. I got to know him later, a sweet guy who worked as a local county commissioner in western North Carolina. I had prepared a mock Geiger counter to show that the effects were harmless. It was a cassette tape recorder with white noise on it and a mike that looked like a radiation detection device. It made noise that sounded like a Geiger counter when I would turn the volume up. I walked up to Albert Canipe, the guy who took the sip of green water, and said, “Do you mind if I do a test?” I held the wand close to his belly, then made the noise of the Geiger counter go sky high, so that it looked as if Albert was radioactive. 300 people in the room were on the floor, laughing. The industry people in front couldn’t stop me. The whole skit took about 15 minutes. Janet said the North Carolina Low-level Radioactive Waste Management Authority never came back to western NC after that to do another public hearing.

Dr. Smello also did the Miss Nuclear North Carolina Pageant involving BREDL staffer, Therese Vick. A meeting of the North Carolina Low-level Radioactive Waste Management Authority had been scheduled in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. At this time, the Authority had eliminated all the candidate sites for the nuclear waste dump except for two, and they were scheduled to make the final selection at this meeting. The two sites that the Authority was considering included one in Hamlet, in the Sandhills region of North Carolina, and one in Apex, North Carolina, near Raleigh, an area where the predominant geological formations are underground structures called diabase dikes.

We used this meeting as an opportunity for another skit, one which we called the Miss Nuclear North Carolina Pageant. The rule of this beauty pageant was that the loser would go on to the final competition, inverting the whole concept. We staged our beauty pageant on the back of my truck. Our pageant had two contenders. One was Miss Sandy Hill from the Hamlet area, played by BREDL staffer Therese Vick. She showed up in a resplendent purple sequined gown, purple eye shadow to the nth degree, looking every bit like a beauty contestant. The other contestant in our pageant was played by an activist named Matt, from Apex, North Carolina. He came dressed like a ballerina, in a pink tutu and leotards, and a huge blonde wig. His name for the pageant was Miss Diabase Dike. He played the role admirably.

After enacting our pageant for the media, we decided to walk into the hotel where the Authority’s meeting was being held. As Pageant moderator, I still had my clown nose, white coat, and polka dot tie on, and was smoking a cigar. Therese and Matt entered in their Pageant costumes. We walked right in like we were there to hear the proceedings, paraded down the middle of auditorium, slowly, looking for seats in the front row. You could have heard a pin drop. We totally stole the show, it rattled their cage.

The upshot is, we’ve continued to use those tactics. In April 2017, we travelled 1,000 miles through areas crossed by the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Mountain Valley Pipeline, pulling with us a mock natural gas compressor station. It made smoke with a smoke machine, and played noise that was a recording of an actual compressor station that was given to us by a community in Pennsylvania. We used a guitar amplifier to raise the volume to 90-95 decibels, a deafening racket. It created a focal point, something visual and tangible to see and hear, in order to make it more real. Before that the idea of a compressor station was an abstract concept. Here’s the demo – hold your ears!

The use of parody is not just for hijinks or comic relief. It is to build confidence and solidarity based on common understandings and symbols. Being negative and victimized doesn’t draw people. It’s better to portray a real sense of confidence and leadership based on the assumption that you are going to win either because you are right or you outnumber the opposition through your activism. People are drawn to success, not failure.

Environmental hit parade

Lou has used his many talents to highlight environmental causes throughout BREDL's history. His gifts in art, music and drama add creativity to all aspects of the League's programs. He often showcases original music at environmental events, known as the environmental hit parade. These songs include "Don't Hog Our Air," "Talkin' Trash Dump Blues," "Ballad of the Watts Farm," and "Talkin' Tarheel Asphalt Blues."

Lou also performed two songs in the hit parade that were written and contributed by BREDL members- "Don't Wanna Get Nuclear Wasted" by Wells Edelman from Durham, North Carolina and "No Place For Nuclear Waste" by Mike Jenkins in Union County, North Carolina.

Let UNC know we don’t want their coal plant anymore!

 

By JennGaller

Every major polluting facility in the country must have an air permit to operate. Permits are required by Title V of the Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act empowers state agencies to issue the Title V permits for each major polluting facility in the state. In North Carolina, the Division of Air Quality issues air permits. Title V permits must be renewed every five years.

North Carolina’s Division of Air Quality has just issued a draft of its air permit for the UNC coal plant. After a public comment period and public hearing, it will issue a final permit that will last for five years.

 

Talking Points/Comment Letter

· The draft permit will significantly increase pollution from the UNC coal plant and worsen the health impacts on the community.

· DAQ has removed the heat input limit from the draft permit, which allows UNC to burn even more coal and emit more toxic air pollution. 

· Without a heat input limit, there is no way to enforce the limit on the amount of pollutants that can be released from the coal plant’s smokestack.

· Without a heat input limit, this permit allows the UNC coal plant to pollute as much as it wants.

· This permit will lead to increased asthma attacks, respiratory illness, heart attacks, and premature death for the surrounding communities.

· The coal-burning power plant is located less than a quarter-mile from UNC Hospitals, harming the health of patients and worsening outcomes during a respiratory pandemic.

· The aging UNC coal plant is the dirtiest coal plant in the state. It has no scrubbers or other pollution control technologies, and UNC has not invested in any upgrades.

· This weakened permit will harm the adjacent Pine Knolls community, a historically and predominantly African American community that has already been disproportionately harmed by the UNC coal plant’s pollution.

 

What is the duration of the public comment period and how do I submit a comment?The public comment period began March 31 and will end May 6.

Comments can be submitted by email to DAQ.publiccomments@ncdenr.gov with the subject line ["UNC.15B"] You may also leave a voicemail comment at (919) 707-8726. Comments will be accepted until May 6, 2021 at 5 p.m.

When is the public hearing?

A public hearing will be held (by telephone) May 4 at 6 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Here are the details about how to register and participate by phone:

Event title: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Date and Time: May 4, 2021 at 6 p.m.

Phone: US TOLL +1-415-655-0003, Access Code 185 344 4346

How can I sign up to speak?

If you wish to speak at the public hearing, you must register by May 4 at 4 p.m.

WebEx Link and Register to speak please visit: https://deq.nc.gov/news/press-releases/2021/03/31/release-public-hearing-draft-unc-title-v-permit-be-held-may-4 or call (919) 618-0968.

We will be blogging individual articles from The League Line, our quarterly newsletter

Link to Winter 2021 League Line: https://www.bredl.org/theleagueline/Winter2021.pdf

#unc #cleanenergy #coalplant

 

 

Tracing the muddy tracks of MVP

 

By Ann Rogers 

Franklin and Roanoke Counties, Virginia have each taken action in response to a request from BREDL that they petition Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to require Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP, LLC) to revise its stormwater management calculations prior to any further pipeline construction in Virginia. Both counties requested that DEQ require these revisions in light of MVP, LLC's consistently abysmal failures to manage stormwater runoff during pipeline construction to date.

 

On October 6, 2020, Roanoke County forwarded to DEQ a request from BREDL and 49 residents of Roanoke County and neighboring communities to require MVP, LLC to revise the Project Specific Standards and Specifications for Virginia, the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and the Stormwater Management Plans for the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), prior to any further pipeline construction in Virginia.

 On October, 20, 2020, the Franklin County Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution requesting that DEQ provide appropriate plan revisions of the MVP project to protect surface and groundwater resources in Franklin County. The following are excerpts from the resolution:

 

WHEREAS Franklin County is required by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to implement a comprehensive stormwater management and erosion and sediment control program to reduce the environmental impacts of development projects within the County; and

WHEREAS Franklin County has been assigned a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for sediment in the Roanoke River and is required by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to implement an action plan to lower sediment loads to the Roanoke River to meet the TMDL; and

WHEREAS the required amount of land-disturbance associated with the MVP excavation far exceeds the area of all land disturbing activities in a typical year for Franklin County and has the potential to cause severe erosion in the County's steep mountainous terrain and sedimentation in the County's lakes, rivers and streams; and

WHEREAS many Franklin County Citizens rely on untreated groundwater from wells or springs for their domestic water supplies; and

WHEREAS the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (BREDL) by letter dated October 6, 2020 has identified a number of continued concerns related to erosion and sediment controls and stormwater management in Virginia and Franklin County; and

WHEREAS without very careful engineering and construction oversight, erosion and sediment from the construction of the proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline could have severe negative consequences for the County's lakes, streams, and rivers as well as its domestic, agricultural, and business water supplies.

BREDL's October 6 letter to Franklin County, as cited in the resolution, was signed by 35 residents of Franklin County. The letter contains a map created by BREDL illustrating the MVP's 78 stream crossings in Franklin County. 

 An article in the October 23 Franklin News Post described the Franklin County Board of Supervisors meeting at which the County’s resolution passed unanimously, saying:

 

Speaking on behalf of North Carolina-based Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League and a Franklin County group, Preserve Franklin, organizer Ann Rogers implored the board to demand that MVP submit erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans specifically for Franklin County sites to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.

 

Rogers asserted that considerable damage has already been done by the pipeline construction and the continuation risks tons of excess sediment washing into the Blackwater River and Smith Mountain Lake. In a Wednesday phone interview she said she believed an attempt by MVP to come up with specific stormwater plans for the county would show that the potential problems could not be managed.

 

At the meeting, board members were on board with her. “When we have all these rains, it seems like our rivers and streams are a lot more dirty, a lot more mud running through those,” said Blackwater District Supervisor Ronnie Mitchell. “Everywhere you see the pipeline, it’s bare ground. There’s very little vegetation growing on it.”

 

Rocky Mount District Supervisor Mike Carter pointed out flooded pipeline sites that drain into the town’s water system. “I do not understand why Mountain Valley cannot get this route under control,” he said.

 

County Administrator Chris Whitlow noted that the county made a similar request in 2015, which was not fulfilled. Assistant County Administrator Steve Sandy explained that the county has no enforcement power over MVP’s erosion control measures.

 

“This board has done this in the past,” said Boone District Supervisor Ronnie Thompson. “They’re not doing what they promised, and our hands are tied, and it’s very frustrating, it’s very aggravating.”

 

On October 26, the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District unanimously passed a resolution requesting that DEQ “consider the concerns raised by BREDL and determine whether revisions or project specific erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans for environmentally sensitive areas of the proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline project that meet all Virginia standards, should be required to ensure that the continued pipeline construction will not have detrimental impacts to the tributaries of the Roanoke River, Blackwater River, Smith Mountain Lake and our aquatic life including the endangered Roanoke logperch.”

 BREDL presented a request for revision of the MVP erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans directly to DEQ and the State Water Control Board on December 9.

 Thank you to our chapter members and allies in Roanoke and Franklin Counties who signed our requests to their county governments, and thanks to the governments of Roanoke County and Franklin County for taking significant action at the request of their constituents.

 We in BREDL look forward to next steps.

We will be blogging individual articles from The League Line, our quarterly newsletter

Link to Winter 2021 League Line: https://www.bredl.org/theleagueline/Winter2021.pdf

#NoMVP #pipelines 

LEAGUE LINE DIRECTOR’S REPORT:The tears of things

 

By Lou Zeller, Executive Director 

The test of our time is raised in sharp relief by the corona virus; that is, the manner in which we confront the plague which has claimed four hundred thousand lives in the U.S. alone and over two million worldwide. 
But will we set our sights high enough? Or will we settle for the possible? Justice and simple fairness require more.

 

The encyclical letter of Pope Francis, quoted below, takes issue with the business-as-usual approach to international relations, an observation extending beyond public health.

 

“We are reminded of the well-known verse of the poet Virgil that evokes the ‘tears of things,’ the misfortunes of life and history.  All too quickly, however, we forget the lessons of history, ‘the teacher of life.’ Once this health crisis passes, our worst response would be to plunge even more deeply into feverish consumerism and new forms of egotistic self-preservation . . .. If only we might keep in mind all those elderly persons who died for lack of respirators, partly as a result of the dismantling, year after year, of healthcare systems.” [1] 

 

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. invoked thunder with his sermon most often remembered as accepting of a drum major for justice; however, only as an exception and otherwise unapproving of self-centered drum majors. In his sermon, he was critical of the world’s major drummer, saying, “But this is why we are drifting. And we are drifting there because nations are caught up with the drum major instinct. ‘I must be first.’ ‘I must be supreme.’ ‘Our nation must rule the world.’  And I am sad to say that the nation in which we live is the supreme culprit. And I'm going to continue to say it to America, because I love this country too much to see the drift that it has taken.” [2]

 

Recent reports on COVID-19 vaccines by the World Health Organization lambast widespread profit-seeking and favoring of the rich over the poor.  Healthier adults in wealthy countries are getting vaccinated before older people or health care workers in poorer countries. WHO’s Director-General Tedros said, “Just 25 doses have been given in one lowest income country—not 25 million, not 25,000—just 25. I need to be blunt: The world is on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure.” The people he referred to are in the west African nation of Guinea.[3]

 

Pope Francis offers further insights, based on meetings with Grand Imam Ahmad Al-Tayyeb and representatives of many faiths, recognizing all human beings as equal in rights, duties and dignity. He said:

 

“True, a worldwide tragedy like the Covid-19 pandemic momentarily revived the sense that we are a global community, all in the same boat, where one person’s problems are the problems of all . . .. If everything is connected, it is hard to imagine that this global disaster is unrelated to our way of approaching reality, our claim to be absolute masters of our own lives and of all that exists . . .. The world is itself crying out in rebellion.” [1]

 

In Virgil’s epic poem, Aeneas sees a mural that depicts battles of the Trojan War and the deaths of his friends and countrymen. Aeneas is moved to tears and says, “There are tears of things and mortal things touch the mind.” [4]

 

Pope Francis concludes, “If only this immense sorrow may not prove useless but enable us to take a step forward towards a new style of life. If only we might rediscover once for all that we need one another, and that in this way our human family can experience a rebirth, with all its faces, all its hands and all its voices, beyond the walls that we have erected.” [1]

 

- - -

[1] Encyclical Letter, “Fratelli Tutti” Pope Francis on Fraternity and Social Friendship, October 3, 2020

 

[2] Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Sermon Delivered at Ebenezer Baptist Church, Atlanta, Georgia, on 4 February 1968

 

[3] “WHO chief lambasts vaccine profits, demands elderly go first,” Associated Press, 1/18/2021

 

[4] The Aeneid, Book I, line 462

 

We will be blogging individual articles from The League Line, our quarterly newsletter

Link to Winter 2021 League Line: https://www.bredl.org/theleagueline/Winter2021.pdf

Chatham Citizens Against Coal Ash Dump : Endurance prevails

Photo from Chatham News-Record

    By Judy Hogan

January 6, 2021 a coal ash victory, at last! In 2014, I didn’t want to be an activist any more. It took too much time, and I’d been fighting environmental issues in Moncure since the summer before I moved here. It was a low-level nuclear dump then, and I wanted the house I’d found and could afford, so I said I’d buy the house and join the fight. I’ve been fighting ever since 1998. Somehow I thought we’d win, but I had no reason to believe that, and it didn’t happen fast.

Then we won in the Superior Court with Judge Fox, but the Court of Appeals sent us back to the first court, and she, who had ruled against us in 2016, ruled for us in 2020. It took a year for Charah to admit that they would not contest her judgment, and papers were signed to mean we had won. As early as 2015, our own Board of Commissioners had made a deal with Duke for receiving 19 million dollars for taking 12 million tons of coal ash. Meantime, some of our activists –Terica Luxton, Johnsie Tipton, and John Cross --had all died of cancer. The groundwater became polluted. The coal ash was being put down where the land was known to have dikes and other irregularities such that it was impossible to monitor the groundwater accurately. The site was wrong, but it took years to win in court.

 

BREDL Chapters EnvironmentaLEE and Chatham Citizens Against Coal Ash, Duke intern Kristina McKean and BREDL’s Therese Vick outside the courtroom (“mine reclamations” case)  August 6, 2019

 

Dr Andrew George (UNC) presenting well-test results at Chatham Citizens Against Coal Ash Dump meeting June 7, 2019

We will be blogging individual articles from The League Line, our quarterly newsletter

Link to Winter 2021 League Line: https://www.bredl.org/theleagueline/Winter2021.pdf

#coalash