We will be blogging individual articles from The League Line, our quarterly newsletter
During the first week of July, residents of Pittsylvania
County, VA voted to form a new chapter of BREDL, named Pittsylvania County
Preservation League. This chapter was formed for the purpose of stopping the
Southgate extension of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, which is planned to
connect to the southern terminus of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) at
Transco Village in Chatham, VA, then run parallel to the existing Transco
pipeline for 26 miles in Pittsylvania County.
As
planned, the Southgate extension consists of approximately 73 miles of new
24-inch and 16-inch-diameter pipeline in Virginia and North Carolina, a new
compressor station, and associated facilities. The Southgate is planned to
terminate at a delivery point with Public Service Company of North Carolina,
Inc. near the City of Graham in Alamance County, NC. The Project is designed to
create 375,000 dekatherms per day of new pipeline capacity.
The Southgate received approval from
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in the form of a certificate of
public convenience and necessity, issued on June 18.
Transco vs. Southgate
The Southgate is the focus of
controversy centered on an agreement between Transcontinental Gas Pipeline
Company, LLC (Transco) and Southgate developer, MVP, regarding the use of the
existing Transco pipeline right-of-way for the construction of the Southgate.
In its Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time issued to FERC in January, Transco
states,
MVP has only recently provided Transco with information
regarding the precise locations of MVP's proposed new pipeline and workspace. A
substantial portion of MVP's proposed Southgate project would be installed
adjacent to Transco's existing system of three and four parallel,
large-diameter pipelines. The new information MVP has made available to Transco
indicates that construction and operation of the Southgate Project as proposed
would severely encroach upon Transco's existing pipeline rights-of-way and
could jeopardize the safety, integrity, operations, and expandability of Transco's
pipeline system.
Transco's Motion to Intervene further
describes the dangerous encroachment of the Southgate on its existing pipeline
operations, stating, “It simply would be irresponsible to allow a pipeline with
zero operating history to have this type of direct overlay on Transco’s
multi-line mainline system . . . Any failure on MVP’s part to properly
construct, manage, operate, and coordinate its activities could cause material
damage to Transco’s pipelines, hindering Transco’s ability to provide safe,
reliable, and critically important service to its customers. . . . Plainly, in
the event of any maintenance or unscheduled activities, MVP’s encroachments
would present a real risk of leaving Transco unable to access its pipeline,
thereby impeding Transco’s ability to safely operate its system and provide
reliable service to its customers.”
One cannot help but detect the urgency
of Transco’s request for help from FERC in managing MVP’s facile appropriation
of right-of-way needed for safe operation of the existing Transco pipeline
system.
On April 6, FERC denied Transco's
request for rehearing.
Our main concern – impacts to aquatic
resources
The members of Pittsylvania County
Preservation League have expressed an interest in the chapter's participation
as a party in administrative and legal proceedings challenging the Southgate as
undertaken by Appalachian Mountain Advocates, a public interest law firm
headquartered in Lewisburg, WV. In this context, it is anticipated that Pittsylvania
County Preservation League will participate as a party in Appalachian Mountain
Advocates' Request for Rehearing challenging the Southgate.
David Nimer, employed by BREDL as a
research consultant this summer prior to his entry into law school in August,
is working with Appalachian Mountain Advocates in developing the factual basis
for the Request for Rehearing, with a filing deadline of July 17.
Among the issues that David is
focusing on is the Southgate's resources. In its 26-mile traverse of Pittsylvania
County, the Southgate crosses several water bodies.
Please see map of the Southgate's path
across 1.5 miles of wetlands associated with White Oak Creek, in Pittsylvania
County:
The Southgate's path through an area
dense with freshwater streams and rivers raises concern over impairment to
those water bodies, including sedimentation, warming of streams through
suppression of tree cover on streambanks for the duration of the commercial
life of the pipeline, dynamic runoff from tree-free areas during rain events
along the entire length of the pipeline, and the planned use of herbicides to
control invasive plant species along the pipeline corridor during the first two
years after construction. Additionally, the sediment flowing downstream from
the Southgate water body crossings will flow into and further damage the Dan
River, which has already suffered critical impairment to water quality as a
result of the coal ash spill of 2014.
Kudos to PCPL!
BREDL is exceedingly pleased to
welcome Pittsylvania County Preservation League as our newest chapter. We look
forward to working with these protectors of Virginia's water-rich Piedmont.
Welcome Pittsylvania County Preservation League! This a is a very informative article! Keep up the good fight!
ReplyDelete